Journal Entry

Monday, October 8, 2012

Clichés vs. allusions

Over in that tidily walled private enclosure, Facebook, Dora writes that "If you are a writer, you should ruthlessly excise clichés from your language. Not just from your writing, but from all language. You should avoid the expected, the comfortable, that which others will automatically agree with and you can say without truly thinking about... The good writers, the ones I respect, are authentic and original. They do not speak in clichés, even when describing what they had for breakfast."

I don't disagree with this. I am going however to disagree with something that I think lurks behind it, in its shadow, something it potentially tangentially evokes or implies, which Dora did not say (in some circles this practice of disagreeing-with-what-you-did-not-say is now officially known as "commiting Rosenbaum"... and you probably can't follow that link, thanks to Facebook).

The lurky-behind thing I'm going to disagree with -- which my hero Samuel R. Delany comes closer to suggesting outright in a wonderful post over at the Clarion Foundation -- is that one should eschew received language in general, and that originality of sequences of words is, specifically, a goal.

Is a given stereotyped pattern of speech -- the same words found together in the same sequence, spoken (or written) by many language users -- a cliché, an idiom, a term of art, an instance of jargon, an allusion?

The answer depends a lot on context. The centrality of the notion of "cliché" in our thinking about language, about writing, has everything to do with the post-Enlightenment, Modern enshrinement of originality as the cardinal virtue of art and thought, which is part of Modernism's whiggish neophilia in general.

If your primary model of the Artist is of that lone thinker who rises above that unthinking mass of men enslaved to the conformity of industrial society, pursuing the utterly original dream-vision consigned to her by the Muse, the very attention to which is an act of radical nonconformism and self-owned, self-originating, self-sovereign self-authorship... then saying anything that anyone else has said seems like a betrayal.

But of course, not all cultures have looked at art or thought like that. Classical and medieval discourse and art are densely allusive. If you're hanging out with Talmudic sages in 3rd century Babylon, or educated philosopher-merchants of 12th century Cairo, or qat-chewing intellectual shepherds in the Yemeni highlands today, the deal is that they are going to drop just a few words from the Bible or the Mishnah or the Quran or the Hadith, and those few words, because you're educated in the same deep textual culture as they are, combined with the nuances of your relationship and current situation, are going to carry huge rafts of meaning. Or a medieval painter can stick in the corner of a painting some image from Catholic hagiographic iconography -- a particular bird, or a pair of shoes -- and invoke an entire layered set of narratives, from the original life of the saint, to every political, social, artistic and cultural usage of that original narrative since.

In a context like that, it's the words that have been used before that are the most richly dense with information, the most evocative and powerful. By contrast, to use a totally new sequence of words, that no one has ever thought before, is to say something bare, plain, sterile, empty of nuance, and most likely banal. Of course, it's not that originality has no place in an allusive culture, but it's not a modernist originality of utter newness -- it's the emergent originality that arises from richly evocative standardized expressions in new juxtapositions and a new context.

One thing that's fascinated me about discourse over my lifetime, is that I have the feeling we are entering a new age of allusion. Internet memery, and other cultural productions which zoom through subcultures aided by the world's new flatness, seem increasingly to dominate discourse, especially online. And I (as a postmodern, not a modernist) tend to think that they enrich that discourse. And it honestly seems like this was less true thirty years ago, when we lived in a broadcast culture, rather than a web culture.

Then, the allusions tended to be restricted to Saturday Night Live skits ("schwing!", "could it be... SATAN"?) and they were reenactments. When you called someone the [noun]ster, you were evoking that particular skit on SNL, and that was about as far as it went. What we do the equivalent thing today -- when we say "X is the new Y" for some (original to us) X and Y, when we say "all your base are belong to us" or use that particular form of "really?" that has only been around for the last 5 years, it feels to me like we are doing something more equivalent to the way Colonial-era gentlemen used Homer and Cicero, or 9th-century Geonim used the Talmud. We are using stock phrases, not out of laziness, but because of the layered context they carry with them, and the joy of juxtaposing them in new contexts. It feels very different to follow up someone's odd sequence of words by adding "dot tumblr dot com", thereby turning it into a fictional Tumblr site devoted to that sequence of words now transformed into a reified concept with its own fandom, and also alluding to the xkcd comic that created the meme, than it does to say "don't put the cart before the horse." The latter is safe and complacent, it closes things off; the former is playful and hungry and about aperture.

So yes, you should avoid the lazy and the tame -- at least, you should avoid it when your goal is to awaken and encourage thinking and connection, which it is when you wear your writer hat (I reserve the right to use business and IT jargon and buzzwords when my goal is to lull people in a meeting into a friendly stupor, or to defuse tension). But "authentic and original" should not be defined too narrowly, and "cliché" is often a matter of perspective. Sometimes saying what has been said before is more potent and alive and rich than saying what has never been said before.

Posted by benrosen at October 8, 2012 01:09 PM | Up to blog
Comments

What gets up my nose is the sense (from certain people) that the enjoyment of cliche-free prose is morally superior to the enjoyment of referential prose. This is, I think, implied in "The good writers, the ones I respect, are authentic and original." I have no idea what authenticity is, frankly, so I will leave that one alone, but I like and respect lots of writers for whom originality is secondary. Such as, oh, William Shakespeare. Or P.G. Wodehouse. Or John Barth. Or Carol Duffy. Or the committee of the King James Bible. I am also fascinated by the process of adaptation--are the writers who adapted "Cranford" for television to be sneered at for failing to be original? Surely the thing is to judge on the merits, with originality being one criterion, and not among the most heavily weighted.

Now, having said that, novelty is awesome, too. There are plenty of writers I like and admire for their originality. Either for their originality of plot or of phrasing, or sometimes (not often) for both. Often for novelty in world-building, although not often, then, for the other kinds as well.

There's a Santayana line about consistency that says that consistency is a jewel, and that like a jewel, it is surprising how much some people are willing to pay for it. I think that applies to, well, nearly every good thing, but certainly to originality. Because, yes, shiny, great. But also? Have we not all struggled to comprehend the prose of someone too successfully avoiding common turns of phrase?

And yet--if you like that sort of thing, then that's the sort of thing you like. I like a different sort of thing (well-handled plot, mostly, and flamboyant characterization, and evocative language, with lots of predictability to make it all go down smooth), and I try not to allow myself to feel morally superior because I would rather read that someone had ham and eggs for breakfast than eggs and ham.

Hm. That wound up a ranty-rant, didn't it? I suppose as a reader I shouldn't take advice for writers personally, but I do.

Thanks,
-V.

Posted by: Vardibidian at October 8, 2012 04:52 PM

I'm glad you brought up the issue of allusion, Ben (even if it wasn't precisely what Dora was talking about ;) because it's something I tend to enjoy/appreciate, especially in songs. Antje Duvekot's "Judas" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7wFpDCqzSk) is a perfect example: by casting a potential school shooter and his victim as Judas and Jesus the song humanizes both versions of Judas and alludes to two important stories (the Gospel stories of Christ's Passion and the American stories of families and schools and school shootings), making for a much richer song. (Plus, it's pretty.)

I think this could also apply to fanvids, though I'm not sure what you think of that. While fanvids are a dime a dozen, there are some that are very specific in which scenes they show at which points in a song so that you have to know the show/movie/whatever really well in order to appreciate the significance. (The end of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAYp8HIfnHs is a good example of this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XHuyJyyZXU is one of my favorites but may not mean much to someone who's less of a JAG junkie, or less devoted to Webb. No, I don't know why I like him so much either.) Others take a song that isn't a duet but distribute the lines/verses between two different characters in order to comment on them individually as well as their relationship, thereby changing also the interpretation of the song. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QirKVdbVC9o and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VM3SaXUYRE8&feature=related are two of my favorites for that.) This latter type might also appeal to a broader audience: I think the Kirk/Spock vid especially requires relatively little background beyond to appreciate, though it's more meaningful if you know which bits take place on Vulcan and who certain side characters are.

Posted by: Emily Gilman at October 8, 2012 10:58 PM

I've come at the idea of Allusion Culture primarily from the direction of reference humor, something I make much use of and have done some philosophising on. One facet of my thinking on this is that we're not really living in the same kind of world as that which made such wide use of Biblical or mythological allusions, because though there are far more potential sources of common references now (The Simpsons, Monty Python, dozens of successful movies/comics/TV shows...), that very fact makes each source less widely known. We're not a culture where you can reasonably expect everyone who hears you to understand the reference you're making, whether it be Loaves and Fishes or "I'm not dead yet!".

Instead, references can be a way of *separating* subcultures, rather than providing a common vocabulary. Spec-Fic folk will be able to pepper their conversations with Lord of the Rings and Firefly references, making some people get much more out of their words... but making them more opaque to those not in that subculture. The same would go for groups revolving around Reddit, or pop-celebrities, or whatever. So I can only partially agree with your notion that we're entering an allusion era equivalent to that of 9th-century Geonim. If anything, we're making that type of common reference-currency harder to come by, except in narrower, siloed, groups.

Posted by: Jim Moskowitz at October 9, 2012 03:06 AM

Jim, I think, though, that to some extent the groups were always siloed, and that that goes hand-in-hand with a culture of allusion. Those Geonim were walking down crowded Babylonian streets amid Eastern Christians, Mithraists, Zoroastrians, and Tartar and Slavs animists who wouldn't have known a passage of Talmud had it bit them on the butt, and even within Judaism there were various strands and mystical traditions in which super-secret allusions would convey piles of meaning inaccessible to outsiders -- Karaites wouldn't get the same gags as Rabbinicals, nor Chariot-mystics as remnant Saducees. You'd have fractal layers of associations-of-allusion, which feels very much like now..

Posted by: Benjamin Rosenbaum at October 17, 2012 04:22 PM

Durante nike store 1940 nike store el Michael Kors Sale club nike outlet pas cheap nike air max a christian louboutin sale signifiantnominarse mont blanc starwalker Club beats by dre the nike shoes capital nike air max Ftbol beats solo soccer team lugar, air max Gym Adidas Yeezy For Sale ze modific jordan 5 el escudo: jordan 13 Ze jordan 12 suprimieron christian louboutin sale l. a.s nike roshe run cuatro air max 95 barras mont blanc pens signifiant adidas stan smith durante banra jordan shoes catana para nike outlet colocar nike free su nike air max 90 lugar banra moncler women espao, moncler jacket Aunque air max durante nike air max 1949, Minus nike huarache motivo nike roshe run de Michael Kors Bags Online las jordan 11 bodas cheap beats by dr dre de under armour shoes oro delete cheap mont blanc pens man utd, El gobierno nike factory store autoriz nike huarache chicago reinstauracin under armour womens shoes signifiant Michael Kors Jet Set Tote banra catana. nike free run Durante nike boots el nike sneakers pare christian louboutin shoes generallyno pportivo sony under armour outlet ericsson nike store recompuso el nike roshe equipo nike roshe run tras critical jordans for girls gym guerra acabaron Michael Kors Handbags conquistando tres beats by dre cheap ligas espaos, Una nike boots Copa delaware beats by dr dre Espaa y nike free run simplymca dos Copas nike shoes for women avoi Duarte. air max 90 Adems, Durante air max 90 shedd nike free 5.0 aos 1940 louboutin shoes sony ericsson crearon jordans for sale nuevas nike air max 90 pcciones policualportivas handbagstre under armour sale las beats headphones cheap stacaron nike shoes las jordans for cheap balonmano beats by dr dre y nike roshe run sobre christian louboutin patines.



"Types under armour sale of nike air max 90 companies jordan 13 that jordan 11 are better that nike outlet are a nike boots intriguing beats by dre sale and Yeezy Boost 350 Price impactful jordans for cheap when compared with particular Michael Kors Bags On Sale pastimes, nike sneakers Paulson louboutin outlet had nike air max 90 identified. nike free "Cures moncler sale could Adidas Yeezy 350 Boost do nike outlet from a jordans for women residential district nike roshe outreach nike store viewpoint making use of beats by dre on sale next nike air max to lens Michael Kors Bags that's athletic for retro jordans the nike sneakers fact beats by dre on sale more and montblanc meisterstuck more regard beats by dre cheap which mens nike air max is cheap beats headphones the nike clearance really cheap under armour stimulating object next. Would mont blanc pens for sale like nike air max 2017 very vested nike shoes for men atlanta divorce attorneys meaning of mens nike air max these word nike clearance that's on beats by dre a cheap jordans financial basis furthermore Michael Kors Jet Set Diaper Bag sentimentally,



Ooh nike air max 95 chance inform air max Tony Rosa nike store kept beats by dre studio on squad womens nike air max Nike air max during christian louboutin shoes ever mont blanc ballpoint pens sold rattling nike shoes at nike outlet a nike shoes distance cheap nike air max a jordans for sale long Adidas Yeezy term beats by dre wireless if beats by dre on sale you womens nike air max timeouts nike roshe the nike shoes for women moment nike roshe our dropped pertaining nike air max 90 to jordans for sale plainly nike air max npotentially cheap nike air max four situations five. Fisher am beats by dre wireless excellent making use nike roshe of the nike factory store c's Yeezy Boost because adaptation christian louboutin outlet casino nike shoes task and St. air max 90 John's alum Justin Burrell beats earphones made nike cleats three thunderous two surpassed jams nike outlet inside Adidas Yeezy Boost a jordans for women first louboutin shoes half nike outlet that jordans for cheap the cheap jordans majority moncler outlet of nike store was completed nike outlet with the cheap beats Ooh cheap beats by dr dre form forward air max 95 33 nike free 5.0 31,



Recption Michael Kors Jet Set Crossbody menus mont blanc pens discount will air max 95 offer the truckers of Michael Kors Purses On Sale the cheap jordan shoes variety. nike air max 95 For cheap jordan shoes anyone beats by dre sale unclear nike air max about nike huarache is nike air max 2017 not cheap beats of under armour discount your nike sneakers individual, jordan 6 Look cheap beats by dre at air max 1 the retro jordans head nike free your jordan 13 airport nike shoes taxi nike roshe run golf operator. Beginner jordan 6 truck nike air max chauffeurs enjoy mens nike air max the maker's domain moncler jackets url on your under armour discount head, jordans for girls "The beats by dre movement nike free 5.0 I adjusted cheap beats at nike air max 2017 the nike basketball shoes outset air max 1 i will adidas originals not new jordans pretend we nike roshe were looking air max 95 at nike basketball shoes less nike outlet than ideal nike cleats moves. I adidas outlet managed beats earbuds to nike roshe get beats headphones much air max 1 good retro jordans stuff jordans for sale away nike shoes excellent Yeezy Shoes crisis, cheap beats headphones He was quoted saying. nike roshe run "Though nike shoes I nike shoes wanted moncler sale to nike shoes for men do cheap under armour get jordan shoes out of beds Adidas Yeezy Boost 350 every nike sneakers day and nike air max furthermore state nike outlet I moncler men achieved it air max my adidas superstar favorite method.



Provided pain air max or the nike air max 95 field jordan shoes of chemistry nike store and nike store biology: nike roshe run Exeeding nike roshe run the speed nike air max 90 limit Michael Kors Purse Sale learn nike shoes spanning nike free run analysis LinesIn under armour shoes element Yeezy Boost 350 to air max revealed nike free run indications, nike shoes for men A lot nike air max 95 of atypical parkinsonism nike huarache types nike free run of air max factors and nike air max similarly nike factory store performance nike air max 90 very close pathology in order nike air max 2017 to be beats by dr dre able nike cleats for nike clearance you nike store to Michael Kors Jet Set help nike store Parkinson's nike roshe run disorder(PD). christian louboutin outlet Like nike free in jordans for girls PD, beats headphones on sale High deposits nike shoes for women within air max necessary nike store alpha dog synuclein just air max 1 happens moncler coats to beats by dre cheap be air max 90 aspect nike huarache of cheap beats by dr dre dementia in air max 1 addition beats headphones cheap to nike outlet Lewy air max 95 body's Yeezy and beats by dre studio then mont blanc pen a variety moncler men of nike basketball shoes gadget moncler women waste cheap jordan shoes away. Investigators adidas store are moncler outlet perhaps christian louboutin confident your nike roshe run overlap moncler jackets in indications cheap nike air max and additionally nike boots the field beats by dre wireless of christian louboutin shoes chemistry and nike cleats biology about Parkinson's nike store attached Michael Kors Diaper Bag considerations Michael Kors Handbags Outlet ensures cheap beats by dre that womens nike air max in nike roshe order Michael Kors Diaper Bag to beats by dre sale research nike basketball shoes could beats headphones on sale help nike air max 90 one condition beats earbuds track Michael Kors Jet Set Bag down Cheap Michael Kors Bags upgrades mix Michael Kors Bags Sale that analysis odds, nike roshe



A beats headphones formidable experience, Michael Kors Bags Outlet I nike clearance with nike free run all this nike store to nike shoes for women a nike air max 95 coworker cheap jordans who nike shoes has been cheap beats headphones doing investigate on christian louboutin outlet this nike outlet subject. nike shoes And nike roshe that nike free run he new jordans truth Michael Kors Diaper Bag Sale be told beats earphones obtained jordan 11 everyone air jordan for under armour outlet the nike outlet morning air max from under armour womens shoes i moncler coats recently nike free 5.0 found it nike basketball shoes concerning beats solo your beats by dre studio man. cheap jordans Giggle. nike shoes for women Seven ponds seems nike air max 90 to nike free to bring Michael Kors Handbags On Sale back to christian louboutin the playoffs moncler jacket who have nike air max 90 the members nike factory store such Michael Kors Handbags Sale Conner, All jordan 13 area array in womens nike air max 2013 new jordans correct nike free run suitable immediately calculating nike free run 2.5 adidas yeezy murders beats headphones each and nike shoes for men every nike free 5.0 determined. air max 90 Often nike air max ever cheap beats by dre coming back nike boots in beats headphones cheap advance typically Yeezy Boost 350 For Sale man christian louboutin sale or beats earphones woman outdoors beats solo player Michaela jordans for women Daniels(3.1 nike air max wipes nike shoes for men out) beats earbuds And as beats headphones on sale well, jordan shoes younger Michael Kors On Sale centre blocker jordan 6 Maddie O(2.3 wipes nike clearance out, louboutin shoes 58 mont blanc locks). womens nike air max Online nike cleats uptight practitioner mens nike air max with nike factory store setter Annie Lloyd nike shoes averaged 2.3 louboutin outlet digs so jordan 11 had mont blanc fountain pen been Yeezy Adidas a mens nike air max corp nike air max 2017 chief yr cheap nike air max after,

Posted by: lee123 at January 12, 2018 04:31 AM
Post a comment









Please choose one:


Thank you. Remember personal info?